H312 Annotated Bibliography Instructions – 40 points  

Purpose

To prepare for the term paper you will need to do some careful research.

· You will select from one of the topics/issues related to HIV/AIDS in an international setting ( not the United States ). Select a topic from the following:

· HIV and Sex Work in ________

· Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV in ________

· HIV and Tuberculosis in ________

· Homophobia and HIV in ________

· HIV in the blood supply in the ________

· Nutrition and HIV in ________

· Antiretroviral therapy in ________

· HIV and Drug Resistance ________

· HIV and Homelessness in ________

· Gender inequality and HIV in ________

· HIV Stigma in ________

· Other in ____________, please contact the instructor for permission

· The annotated bibliography is a list of citations for scholarly works (i.e., books, articles, etc.), with each citation being followed by a descriptive and critical paragraph.1

· This paragraph, or annotation, is designed to inform the reader of the relevance, importance, and validity of the sources selected.1

· The annotated bibliography should be considered a useful tool in the research process, and can be immensely helpful in identifying quality sources, and in organizing how those sources will be used in your research paper.

Content

The goal of this paper is to investigate a topic of interest in an international setting [i.e., a foreign country]. This annotated bibliography should include:

· FIVE sources that have been deemed relevant to support your groups chosen topic.

· At least four other sources besides the internet for the paper.

· You may only include ONE web source for this assignment

· Examples of good sources for topics of this nature include: the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the World Health Organization, and peer-reviewed journal articles (accessible through the OSU Library website), among others.

· Your annotations need to be based on quality, unbiased, accurate sources.  

· If you have questions on what constitutes a “good” source, please let me know.

Requirements

The annotated bibliography must be done in a scholarly fashion. As such, it should include:

1. Use APA. https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/

2. The annotation should be concise, but still contain enough detail to summarize the source (approx. 5-7 sentences). Synthesize the information in your own words. Do NOT copy/paste the abstract from a source.

3. Following the summary, in one to two sentences, explain how the source is relevant to your chosen paper topic.

4. appropriate language, grammar, and punctuation for a collegiate-level writing assignment.

5. Follow this web address for additional information about annotated bibliographies

http://guides.library.cornell.edu/c.php?g=32342&p=203789

Rubric (Each cell represent the maximum number of points not minimum)

EVALUATION CRITERION
QUALITY OF INFORMATIONInformation clearly relates to main topic. It includes several supporting details and/or examples. (10)Information clearly relates to main topic. It provides one or two supporting details and/or examples. (8)Information clearly relates to main topic. However, no details and/or examples are given to reinforce information points. (6)Information has little or nothing to do with main topic. (5)Not met(0)
WORK PRODUCT DEMONSTRATES STRATEGIC THINKINGProject includes aspects that clearly demonstrate strong originality in thinking about concepts based on evidence found in research. Effective use of originality, fluency, and/or elaboration is clear to the reader.(10)Project includes aspects that clearly demonstrate some originality in thinking about concepts based on evidence found in research. Reasonable use of originality, fluency, and/or elaboration helps reader get message. (8)Project demonstrates effort to include original thinking and demonstrates some use of originality, fluency, and/or elaboration. However effort falls short of bridging the reader’s understanding with ideas student asserts. (6)roject appears mostly straightforward/typical or informational in its presentation. No attempt is made to extend ideas beyond the research evidence.(5)Not met(0)
WRITTEN PRESENTATIONOverall appearance of work product approaches a professional look and suggests great attention to detail. Appears student spent some time not only planning content, but also with presentation quality of work product. (10)Evidence that time and care were taken in completing the project, and some attention to detail seems apparent. Appears the student spent reasonable time on the content and presentation of the work product.(8)Average time and care was taken in completing the work product. There is attention to detail, but not at the level of superior work. Content and presentation somewhat meets expectations.(6)The work product appears somewhat “thrown together” with little attention to detail.(5)Not met(0)
FOLLOWED INSTRUCTIONS PROPERLYAll listed instructions were followed in detail and all items specified in the assignment are clearly demonstrated.(10)Most of the listed assignment instructions are followed in detail and most assignment specifications are clearly demonstrated.(8)Some of the listed instructions are not followed and some of items required in the assignment are not demonstrated.(6)Instructions were not followed and all items specified in the assignment are not demonstrated.(5)Not met(0)
Total Out of 40403224200