LEAD 510 Mentoring Grading Rubric

CriteriaLevels of Achievement
Content 70%Advanced 92-100% (A)Proficient 84-91% (B)Developing 1-83% (< C)Not present
Introduction:3Provides a 1-page (250-300 words) rationale why mentoring is important supported by at least one footnote/citation2Provides a 200-250 word rationale why mentoring is important; no documentation provided1Provides a rationale of less than 200 words why mentoring is important – no documentation0 points
Comparison and Contrast41-45Compares and contrasts the 2 mentoring interviews (3 page- 750-900 word minimum).38-40Compares and contrasts the 2 mentoring interviews (2 page- 500-749 words)1-37Compares and contrasts the 2 mentoring interviews (less than 500 words)0 points
Conclusion5Describes the top 3 lessons on mentoring learned from the interviews and how they will impact your implementation of mentoring (250-300 words).4Describes the top 2 lessons on mentoring learned from the interviews and how they will impact your implementation of mentoring (200-249 words).1-3Provides 0-1 lessons on mentoring learned from the interviews and how they will impact your implementation of mentoring (Less than 200 words).0 points
Structure 30%Advanced 92-100% (A)Proficient 84-91% (B)Developing 1-83% (< C)Not present
Structure20-22Format, Title page and Bibliography are free from grammar/spelling errors and are consistent with formatting of the student’s program (e.g. Turabian, APA and AMA formatting guides are provided by Liberty University)18-19Format, Title page and Bibliography have 6-10 grammar/spelling errors and are inconsistent with formatting of the student’s program (e.g. Turabian, APA and AMA formatting guides are provided by Liberty University)1-17Format, Title page and Bibliography have more than 10 grammar/spelling errors and do not correlate with formatting of the student’s program.0 points