LEAD 510 Mentoring Grading Rubric
Criteria | Levels of Achievement | |||
Content 70% | Advanced 92-100% (A) | Proficient 84-91% (B) | Developing 1-83% (< C) | Not present |
Introduction: | 3Provides a 1-page (250-300 words) rationale why mentoring is important supported by at least one footnote/citation | 2Provides a 200-250 word rationale why mentoring is important; no documentation provided | 1Provides a rationale of less than 200 words why mentoring is important – no documentation | 0 points |
Comparison and Contrast | 41-45Compares and contrasts the 2 mentoring interviews (3 page- 750-900 word minimum). | 38-40Compares and contrasts the 2 mentoring interviews (2 page- 500-749 words) | 1-37Compares and contrasts the 2 mentoring interviews (less than 500 words) | 0 points |
Conclusion | 5Describes the top 3 lessons on mentoring learned from the interviews and how they will impact your implementation of mentoring (250-300 words). | 4Describes the top 2 lessons on mentoring learned from the interviews and how they will impact your implementation of mentoring (200-249 words). | 1-3Provides 0-1 lessons on mentoring learned from the interviews and how they will impact your implementation of mentoring (Less than 200 words). | 0 points |
Structure 30% | Advanced 92-100% (A) | Proficient 84-91% (B) | Developing 1-83% (< C) | Not present |
Structure | 20-22Format, Title page and Bibliography are free from grammar/spelling errors and are consistent with formatting of the student’s program (e.g. Turabian, APA and AMA formatting guides are provided by Liberty University) | 18-19Format, Title page and Bibliography have 6-10 grammar/spelling errors and are inconsistent with formatting of the student’s program (e.g. Turabian, APA and AMA formatting guides are provided by Liberty University) | 1-17Format, Title page and Bibliography have more than 10 grammar/spelling errors and do not correlate with formatting of the student’s program. | 0 points |