Students will write a 2-page paper (~500 words) that summarizes and analyzes an article from a peer-reviewed journal and where the topic is related to the course outcomes and module topics. The purpose of this paper is to introduce you to the process of reading and evaluating existing research that will help you to formulate public policy. The individual paper is worth up to 200 points toward the final grade. In-text source citations, as well as your reference list, should both be in alignment with APA 6th edition citation form and style (See Purdue University’s Online Writing Lab (Links to an external site.) for more information). You can also access the FSCJ LibGuide about APALinks to an external site..The three articles linked below are sample articles for you to review. You may use one of them for your review or you may elect to choose a different article with a topic relevant to this course.Collins, M. L., & Peerbolte, S. L. (2011). An Exploratory Research Design Further Demonstrating the Need for the Integration of Critical Thinking Skill Curricula in Homeland Security and Emergency Management Higher Education Academic Programs. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 8(2).Collins, M. L., & Kapucu, N. (2008). Early warning systems and disaster preparedness and response in local government. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 17(5), 587-600.Kapucu, N., Arslan, T., & Collins, M. L. (2010). Examining intergovernmental and interorganizational response to catastrophic disasters: Toward a network-centered approach. Administration & Society.This assignment requires a file upload submission. After you have reviewed the assignment instructions and rubric, as applicable, complete your submission by selecting the Submit Assignment button next to the assignment title. Browse for your file and remember to select the Submit Assignment button below the file to complete your submission. Review the confirmation annotation that presents after submission.AttachmentsCollinsKapucu2008.pdfCollinsPeerbolte2011.pdfKapucuArslanCollins2010.pdfDSC3079 Essay One Assignment.pdf
158010119901/26/202011:59pm
File UploadOffice 365Studio          Upload a file, or choose a file you’ve already uploaded.                     File:remove empty attachment
           Add Another File           remove empty attachmentClick here to find a file you’ve already uploaded
CancelSubmit Assignment          Submitting…       #google_docs_tree li.folder {       cursor: pointer;     }     #google_docs_tree li.file {       cursor: pointer;       -moz-border-radius: 3px;       width: 80%;       padding-right: 20px;     }     #google_docs_tree li.file:hover {       background-color: #eee;     }     ul.instTree li span.active {       background: none;     }     #google_docs_tree li.file.leaf.active {       background-color: #ddd;     }     #google_docs_tree li.file .filename {       float: left;       max-width: 98%;     }     #google_docs_tree li.file .popout {       float: right;     }      

Rubric
true




44285



Can’t change a rubric once you’ve started using it.
Find a Rubric
Title: Find Rubric
Essay One Rubric
     You’ve already rated students with this rubric.  Any major changes could affect their assessment results.     
Essay One Rubric CriteriaRatings      Pts     Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis of Knowledge _307329_1
view longer description
Range               
         threshold:            pts         Edit ratingDelete rating

50.0 to >40.0 pts                 Exemplary
The paper thoroughly and cohesively links concepts and learning objectives to the current topic. Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the article.
_1214198_1
Edit ratingDelete rating

40.0 to >30.0 pts                 Accomplished
The paper cohesively links concepts and learning objectives to the current topic. Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis.
_1214197_1
Edit ratingDelete rating

30.0 to >20.0 pts                 Developing
The paper links concepts and learning objectives to the current topic but is lacking cohesiveness. Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment.
_1214196_1
Edit ratingDelete rating

20.0 to >0 pts                 Beginning
The paper does not cohesively link concepts and learning objectives to the current topic. Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment.
_1214195_1        This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.                  pts       

 /         50.0 pts

—
Additional CommentsEdit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFoundation of Knowledge _307330_1
view longer description
Range               
         threshold:            pts         Edit ratingDelete rating

50.0 to >40.0 pts                 Exemplary
The paper thoroughly incorporates appropriate source material to develop and substantiate the analysis.
_1214202_1
Edit ratingDelete rating

40.0 to >30.0 pts                 Accomplished
The paper incorporates appropriate source material to develop and substantiate the analysis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.
_1214201_1
Edit ratingDelete rating

30.0 to >20.0 pts                 Developing
While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment.
_1214200_1
Edit ratingDelete rating

20.0 to >0 pts                 Beginning
The paper does not incorporate appropriate source material to develop and substantiate the analysis. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements.
_1214199_1        This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.                  pts       

 /         50.0 pts

—
Additional CommentsEdit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization of Ideas/Format _307331_1
view longer description
Range               
         threshold:            pts         Edit ratingDelete rating

50.0 to >40.0 pts                 Exemplary
The paper thoroughly follows APA formatting and style guidelines. There is an introduction, logical body, and summary. Thesis is clearly defined and well constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment.
_1214206_1
Edit ratingDelete rating

40.0 to >30.0 pts                 Accomplished
The paper follows APA formatting and style guidelines. There is an introduction, logical body, and summary. Thesis is defined and mostly well constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment.
_1214205_1
Edit ratingDelete rating

30.0 to >20.0 pts                 Developing
The paper does not follow APA formatting and style guidelines. An introduction, logical body, and/or summary is lacking. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts.
_1214204_1
Edit ratingDelete rating

20.0 to >0 pts                 Beginning
The paper does not follow APA formatting and style guidelines. Multiple aspects, such as introduction, logical body, and summary are lacking. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Introduction of thesis is not clearly evident.
_1214203_1        This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.                  pts       

 /         50.0 pts

—
Additional CommentsEdit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Skill / Research Skill _307332_1
view longer description
Range               
         threshold:            pts         Edit ratingDelete rating

50.0 to >40.0 pts                 Exemplary
The paper is grammatically flawless and free of spelling errors. The paper is in the active voice. The student demonstrate an ability to excel at independent academic research by incorporating peer review academic articles, books, or other material from government institutions.
_1214210_1
Edit ratingDelete rating

40.0 to >30.0 pts                 Accomplished
The paper is grammatically correct and free of spelling errors. The paper is in the active voice. The student demonstrate an ability to perform independent academic research by incorporating peer review academic articles, books, or other material from government institutions.
_1214209_1
Edit ratingDelete rating

30.0 to >20.0 pts                 Developing
The paper has grammatical and spelling errors. The paper is not in the active voice. The student does not demonstrate an ability to perform independent academic research by incorporating peer review academic articles, books, or other material from government institutions.
_1214208_1
Edit ratingDelete rating

20.0 to >0 pts                 Beginning
The paper is filled with grammatical and spelling errors. The paper is not in the active voice. The student does not demonstrate an ability to perform independent academic research by incorporating peer review academic articles, books, or other material from government institutions.
_1214207_1        This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.                  pts       

 /         50.0 pts

—
Additional CommentsEdit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterion
view longer description
Range               
         threshold:           5 pts         Edit ratingDelete rating

5to >0 pts                 Full Marks

blank
Edit ratingDelete rating

0to >0 pts                 No Marks

blank_2        This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.                  pts       

 /         5 pts

—
Additional CommentsTotal Points:                           200.0